| REGULATION IMPACT ASSESMENT (RIA) |
 |
The reports and papers that you find on this page are
the result of IME efforts to assess costs and benefits of different
economic policies and legislative changes, implementing the methodology
used by the UK government, US government, OECD and other good practices
of public debate over impact of proposed regulations.
Pre-Feasibility Study of the Establishment of a Better
Regulation Unit in Bulgaria
IME, 2003
This in-depth overview of the current situation has been
completed in order to assess the design and purpose of a provisional
establishment of the Better Regulation Unit (BRU).
The existing legislative framework and unwritten rules may, paradoxically,
both facilitate and hinder the activities of the Unit. This is especially
true for the draft consultation process and for the data collected and
disseminated by the administrative units.
The unit will be designed to promote the principles of good regulation
throughout central and local government, to remove unnecessary, outmoded
or over-burdensome legislation and to control secondary legislation
and its enforcement. To support the administrative reforms in Bulgaria
the BRU will not only prepare guidelines and enforce better regulation
principles but will also assist relevant government agencies with consultations
and in-depth studies on particular regulatory issues (as it is in some
OECD countries and especially in the UK with its Regulatory Impact Unit
and Better Regulation Task Force that prepares impact assessment studies).
(File size 532 KB) | Read it in:
Is the psoposed Bulgarian government strategy on municipal
watse separation cost efficient?
Maria Velkova, Environmental Change and Management, University of
Oxford
2003
(File size 1446 KB) Read it in:
"Trial-and-error" or preliminary regulatory impact
assessment?
Latchezar Bogdanov, IME
George Ganev, PhD, CLS
(File size 49KB) | Read it in: 
Efficiency of the Health Reform
By Latchezar Bogdanov and Assenka Yonkova
(File size 88KB) | Read it in:
How the investment projects in Maritza East may be
evaluated?
By Dr. Krassen Stanchev and Latchezar Bogdanov
(File size 37KB) | Read it in:
Laws and Wealth
By Dr. Krassen Stanchev, Latchezar Bogdanov, Petya Mandova, Martin Dimitrov
(File size 44KB) | Read it in:
Myths About International Trade
By Latchezar Bogdanov and Georgi Stoev
Read it in:
Liberalization of the Energy Market in Bulgaria
By Dr. Krassen Stanchev and Latchezar Bogdanov
(File size 37KB) | Read it in:
Draft SME Act: Assessment of Implementation Problems
and Institutional Impact
By Krassen Stanchev, Latchezar Bogdanov, George Ganev
Read it in:
The Price of the Legal Software
By Yordanka Gancheva
Read it in:
Possible Impacts of Tourism Activities Licensing in
Bulgaria
By Georgi Stoev
Read it in:
Legal and Regulatory Reform: Impacts on Private Sector
Growth
IME
The report is the first attempt for a comprehensive overview of the
legal and regulatory reforms in the country from the point of view of
their impact on private sector development in 1998-1999.
2000
(File size 52KB) Read it in:
Ministerial Intervention in Road Freight Transportation
By Krassen Stanchev and George Ganev
Read it in:
Companies' expenditures related to the abolishment
of the "zeros"
IME
(File size 30KB) | Read it in:
World Bank Strategy Document for Yugoslavia: Outsiders
Comments and Recommendation on Issues Related to Public Governance,
Privatization and Labor Market
IME
(File size 60KB) | Read it in:
Effectiveness of Public-Private Dialogue in Bulgaria
By Petya Mandova
This paper is focused on current procedures, legal barriers to
participate in decision-making process, common topics of dialogue. It
presents several cases of institutionalized dialogue.
(File size 65KB) | Read it in:
Current Regulation Drafting Procedure
By Petya Mandova and Latchezar Bogdanov
The report presents the results from a case study on the document
flow and regulatory procedure. The interviews with public officials
in three branches of the executive power (Ministry of Finance, Ministry
of Economy and Ministry of Agriculture) were held in a three-week period.
(File size 60KB) | Read it in:
|